|
|
is an extension of the web project Sylva, wherein the forest metaphor acts as a correlation of human transcendence in the terrain of cultural memory. In mythic terms, the forest is a place where one can be confused or get lost or where, conversely, one can find asylum or agency, and the way home again. For the three collaborators the forest provided an imaginative domain with many paths to follow and explore. It animated a special discussion and vantage point about nature and its representations through which each of the collaborators points of view have been developed and facilitated through the use of the web in a private process of exchange.
The recently released public version of the web site will greatly differ from its original state, which was more book-like in its presentation. The project was graciously supported by The Thing server in New York, from July 97 until winter 98.
Context
To pursue this dialogue, the tapes have been chosen to reflect varied points of view about nature, and more specifically the theme of landscape. A shifting multiplicity is at the core of the landscape concept which points to the blurring of strict delimited territories of the notion of nature itself. On one hand, nature is understood as an independent set of values and authenticity (pre-discursive nature, nevertheless presently contaminated) and on the other hand, in its opposition to culture, is perceived as a political, institutionalized construct. Whereas the landscape has often been perceived in an idealized way, separate in and of itself, there is an essential key to breaking down the projection mechanisms which prevent a more unified experience with nature. In other words:
(...), it is not clear that by becoming more mystical or religious about nature one necessarily overcomes the damaging forms of separation or loss of concern which have been the consequence of a secular and instrumental rationality. What is really needed, one might argue, is not so much new forms of awe and reverence of nature, but rather to extend to it some of more painful forms of concern we have for ourselves. The sense of rupture and distance which has been encouraged by secular rationality may be better overcome, not by worshipping this nature that is other to humanity, but through a process of re-sensitization to our combined separation from it and dependence upon it.
Kate Soper, Nature/nature in FutureNatural, edited by G. Robertson, M. Mash and others, Routledge London, 1996, p.32.
The works presented here put forth a renewed focus and interpretation of nature in relation to ones inherently mobile and ephemeral position in the world as a whole. They signal a need for change in the portrayal of the environment, to rethink a dominant westernized anthropomorphic-centered view which invariably perpetrates dualistic and mutually exclusive perceptions.
Nevertheless, the selection of tapes calls to acknowledge the interdependent existence of nature, culture and capital, to consider a perception which is trained by the aesthetical validation systems of (our) history. What becomes of the idea of a cultivated, tamed landscape of beauty that calls for preservation? Or the reality, in a global economy, of industrialized and developing societies that act destructively against nature to acquire better human standards of living? Or the socio-biological determinations of science which would need to be debated publicly? This questioning does not however deny the impending limits of our disastrous exploitation of natural resources. Our respective and collective responsibility concerning ecological sustainability needs to be acted upon beyond the filters of cultural interpretation. |